[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: MAKEDEV loses on update
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:43:12 am Greg Troxel wrote:
> I use a script to install a built release on the running system, and one
> of the things it does is run MAKEDEV all. For a while (in current),
> I've been seeing errors that seem to be complaints about files that
> already exist.
> MAKEDEV(8) doesn't say that one can't rerun it, and I think one has to
> to get new devices. But, puffs is now a symlink to putter, and the old
> node didn't get removed.
> Please let me know if there's already a PR on this - I thought I'd ask
> before making a dup. Querying the database, I didn't find any.
> I don't get this problem with
> ./MAKEDEV -m /sbin/mknod all
> So should pax be given some argument to force replacing the file? Or is
> the use of pax limited to empty directories?
This seems to have been the case since pax was introduced. I did mention it on
the list and provided the output but the response what that it was expected
behaviour. I've overcome it by specifying -f which I believe invokes mknod
anyway. My concern is when using etcupdate, will the required devices be
regenerated when a device of the same name exists, this may be as simple as a
Main Index |
Thread Index |