[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: sysctl documentation
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:58:51 -0500
Michael Graff <explorer%flame.org@localhost> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 March 2008 12:29:57 Greg Troxel wrote:
> > On a side note, our default send/receive socket values are small
> > enough that I can only get 350 kbytes/sec using scp between a 100
> > GB link here at IETF and a 1 GB link back in California. Upping
> > these to 2x their current values let
> > Wow, do you really mean 100 GB or 100 Mb/s?
> I really mean 100 GB. With IPv6 even.
> Of course, it's split down so much that no one user could come close
> to that even if we had 100 machines with gigabit interfaces, so it's
> rather silly.
> > I agree; these shoudl be in tcp(4) and sysctl should point to
> > inet(4) for net.inet and that should point to tcp(4).
> Perhaps this is somehing I can do while on a plane, and submit diffs.
> Better documentation is always good, but no matter how awesome the
> words are, if one cannot find them, they are worthless. :)
> I'll make a list of items. Ideally, each name should be documented
> somewhere obvious, with pointers around to the more detailed parts.
> I'll see what I can come up with in my non-copious spare time.
I just noticed that sendbuf_auto and recvbuf_auto aren't even in
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Main Index |
Thread Index |