[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: msk(4) require to sync status buffer
I apologize to a very slow reply.
From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:57:08 +0900
> Anyway, I don't think it's a good idea to use a pointer
> against DMA descriptor in that way because we should reduce
> accesses against DMA descs to avoid cache issue.
> I'd suggest to rewrite the while() loop in msk_intr(),
> how about this one?
I tried variously today. And, neither patch seems to be also appropriate.
For instance, I logged in other hosts with ssh(1) and executed 'ls -R /'.
The response died after it had operated for a while. This msk(4) was not
able to be communicated after this. X-<
Synchronous timing seems not to be correct yet.
Main Index |
Thread Index |