Re: vndconfig vs mount_cd9660

[mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)]

reinoud%NetBSD.org@localhost (Reinoud Zandijk) writes:

>Unlike CD9660 with its fixed sector size of 2048, UDF is defined and accepts
>all sector sizes that are a multiple of 512. It retrieves the sector size from
>the medium as per specification. Without the size specification it will use
>the blocksize of the fake disklabel made up by vnd and thus 512. Maybe the
>disc label creation code could be enhanced to detect this situation?

The label always returns the sector size of the device, i.e. whatever
you told vndconfig to present.


-- 
-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."