[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: vndconfig vs mount_cd9660
reinoud%NetBSD.org@localhost (Reinoud Zandijk) writes:
>Unlike CD9660 with its fixed sector size of 2048, UDF is defined and accepts
>all sector sizes that are a multiple of 512. It retrieves the sector size from
>the medium as per specification. Without the size specification it will use
>the blocksize of the fake disklabel made up by vnd and thus 512. Maybe the
>disc label creation code could be enhanced to detect this situation?
The label always returns the sector size of the device, i.e. whatever
you told vndconfig to present.
Michael van Elst
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Main Index |
Thread Index |