Re: vndconfig vs mount_cd9660

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:35:15AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> That did the trick:
> 
> # vnconfig vnd0 file.iso  2048/1/1/1
> # mount_udf -o ro /dev/vnd0a /mnt                                                                                                                                                      
> 
> disklabel was not more usable than before.
> 
> Is "2048/1/1/1" reasonable or should different values be used?

Technically not, but I guess everything but the byte per sector value
are unused anyway.

I would prefer if vnconfig had a simple sector size arg and could calculate
a "reasonable" geometry itself - or even better if mount_udf had an option
to force a sector size (instead of asking the disk).

Martin