tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

RE: [patch] usbdevs(8) use strtol(3) instead of atoi(3) for more predictable result

To: "'Alexander Kuleshov'" <kuleshovmail%gmail.com@localhost>, <tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: RE: [patch] usbdevs(8) use strtol(3) instead of atoi(3) for more predictable result
From: "Terry Moore" <tmm%mcci.com@localhost>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 14:22:13 -0500

> Yes, but usbdevs(8) everywhere counts devices from zero, so probably this
should be updated,
> if it is ok I will take a look there and fix this if need in a separate
patch.

As you wish. At the very least the man page could be updated to indicate
that -a specifies a device *index*, not a *USB bus address*. That might be
enough for now.

References:
- [patch] usbdevs(8) use strtol(3) instead of atoi(3) for more predictable result
  - From: Alexander Kuleshov
- RE: [patch] usbdevs(8) use strtol(3) instead of atoi(3) for more predictable result
  - From: Terry Moore
- Re: [patch] usbdevs(8) use strtol(3) instead of atoi(3) for more predictable result
  - From: 'Alexander Kuleshov'

Prev by Date: RE: [patch] usbdevs(8) use strtol(3) instead of atoi(3) for more predictable result
Next by Date: Re: [patch] usbdevs(8) use strtol(3) instead of atoi(3) for more predictable result
Previous by Thread: Re: [patch] usbdevs(8) use strtol(3) instead of atoi(3) for more predictable result
Next by Thread: Re: [patch] usbdevs(8) use strtol(3) instead of atoi(3) for more predictable result
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index