Re: colorls in base

[Benny Siegert <bsiegert%gmail.com@localhost>]

> Yes, what I don't understand (because nobody has stated a technical
> reason other than 'fluff'), why we shouldn't we have the feature in base
> at all. Nobody proposed to enable it by default.

Thank you!

I personally think it is unreasonable to oppose adding a
default-disabled feature like this one because you won't use it for
whatever reason. Would I use colored ls? Maybe. But if I don't like
it, I won't enable it.

-- 
Benny