Re: Rumpification (was Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/envstat)

[Antti Kantee <pooka%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Tue Dec 14 2010 at 13:25:25 -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
> > Do you have an objection (apart from the one in the beginning of the
> > mail where you indicated you don't like the new outlook of the code)?
> > If not, consider it a fun experiment where you gain a ton of features
> > for the cost of a bucket of paint.
> 
> We have now changes from having POSIX compliant sources to something
> that isn't.  In your example it's a high VOC paint that causes cancer
> in long term exposure.

Can you point out a specific case of where POSIX compliance has been
lost due to my work?

-- 
älä karot toivorikkauttas, kyl rätei ja lumpui piisaa