Re: interface name optional in wake(8)

[Matthias Scheler <tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost>]

On 5 Jan 2010, at 6:28, Marc Balmer wrote:
>> That said, if allowing not to specify an interface and there are
>> multiple available ones, would it make sense to exit with an error
>> instead of sending the packet over a random interface?  Unless a flag
>> is given to use all interfaces, of course.
> 
> That is exactly the beahviour we have now (after my last commit).

May I suggest that "wake" prints out the name of the ethernet interface
in the auto detection case? This will make it easier for the user to
realise if "wake" is picking another interface than expected.

        Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                           http://zhadum.org.uk/