Re: groff/-mandoc replacement

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost>]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 05:20:16PM +0000, Michael van Elst wrote:
> joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost (Joerg Sonnenberger) writes:
> 
> >On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:55:40PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> >> I think that in general LPL is preferable to CDDL.  Is Plan9 ditroff
> >> really unlike the rest of Plan9 in lacking Unicode support?
> 
> >It has UTF8 support. Somewhat.
> 
> It lacks a mandoc macroset though.... Mixing in the macros from
> Heirloom helps, but I have no idea what the resulting license
> would be.

The mandoc macros are BSD licensed.

-- 
Thor Lancelot Simon                                        
tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost
    "Even experienced UNIX users occasionally enter rm *.* at the UNIX
     prompt only to realize too late that they have removed the wrong
     segment of the directory structure." - Microsoft WSS whitepaper