Re: groff/-mandoc replacement

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:55:40PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > Plan9 ditroff falls under Lucent Public License (IIRC) and
> > OpenSolaris/Heirloom ditroff under CDDL. For various reasons, the
> > Heirloom version is likely the best, e.g. it supports some of the
> > critical GNU extensions (like no limit of 10 arguments) and has
> > Unicode support.
> 
> I think that in general LPL is preferable to CDDL.  Is Plan9 ditroff
> really unlike the rest of Plan9 in lacking Unicode support?

It has UTF8 support. Somewhat.

Joerg