tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P

To: tech-userlevel%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P
From: der Mouse <mouse%Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA@localhost>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:17:03 -0500 (EST)

> Also swap is usually on top [who mounts things on top of swap?],

mfs, if naught else.  Or are you drawing a distinction between swap and
VM?  In that case, I doubt anything _can_.

/~\ The ASCII                           der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML               mouse%rodents.montreal.qc.ca@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

References:
- Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P
Next by Date: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Previous by Thread: Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P
Next by Thread: Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index