Re: BitKeeper open-sourced

[Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>]

On 05.06.2016 22:09, David Holland wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 11:23:24AM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>  > It matches the requirements of David Holland from "preliminary version
>  > control requirements" [1], except branching -- as branches are handled
>  > as separate clones. According to the upstream developers it should work
>  > well for releng.
> 
> Really? It doesn't have branches at all?
> 
> branches-as-clones won't cut it. Even if it works for releng, which I
> doubt, where do we put things like tls-maxphys?
> 

I'm adding BK devs to CC.