Re: BitKeeper open-sourced

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 11:23:24AM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
 > It matches the requirements of David Holland from "preliminary version
 > control requirements" [1], except branching -- as branches are handled
 > as separate clones. According to the upstream developers it should work
 > well for releng.

Really? It doesn't have branches at all?

branches-as-clones won't cut it. Even if it works for releng, which I
doubt, where do we put things like tls-maxphys?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost