Re: Git conversions and branches

To: Alan Barrett <apb%cequrux.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Git conversions and branches
From: Curt Sampson <cjs%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:57:03 +0900

On 2010-01-13 11:47 +0200 (Wed), Alan Barrett wrote:

> They do have branches in them.

Ah, yes. The issue was that I thought I was in my rsync'd repo when I
was checking for branches, but I was actually in a clone of that. Doh.

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson         <cjs%cynic.net@localhost>         +81 90 7737 2974
             http://www.starling-software.com
The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism
by those who have not got it.    --George Bernard Shaw

References:
- git copies of cvs modules available
  - From: S.P.Zeidler
- Git conversions and branches
  - From: Curt Sampson
- Re: Git conversions and branches
  - From: Alan Barrett

Prev by Date: Re: Git Stability
Next by Date: Re: git copies of cvs modules available
Previous by Thread: Re: Git conversions and branches
Next by Thread: The first step away from CVS
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index