Re: math/suitesparse breakage

["Dr. Thomas Orgis" <thomas.orgis%uni-hamburg.de@localhost>]

Just here for the typos … since those differences could be crucial.

Am Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:05:41 +0000 (UTC)
schrieb Kevin Bloom <ktnb%netbsd.org@localhost>:

> If this line is added to suitespare's Makefile, on NetBSD it
> fails with a linking error to gfortran.so.3

That's so.5, right?

>         -lgfortran.5 => /usr/pkg/gcc10/lib/./libgfortran.so.5
>         -lquadmath.0 => /usr/pkg/gcc10/lib/./libquadmath.so.0

> 2. building math/lapack, math/blas, and susquently math/suitesparse
>    on linux fails to build.
> thor@ mentioned that he has this issue when using gcc12 but is able
> to build it successfully with gcc12.

I am able to build with gcc11 from Ubuntu and with gcc13 from
self-installed toolchain on Debian 12. The gcc12 on Debian 12 also
fails.

So it might be not the GCC version itself, but the way it was built,
and maybe just the binutils associated with it (I build binutils
in-tree with gcc). This used to work before … I'm sure. Do we have an
overview of past bulk builds to see when math/blas started failing?


Alrighty then,

Thomas

-- 
Dr. Thomas Orgis
HPC @ Universität Hamburg