Re: x11/worker build failure on NetBSD 9

[Paolo Vincenzo Olivo <vins%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On 25/06/06 08:50AM, nia wrote:
> 
> 
> It probably defeats the purpose of such a lightweight file manager
> to require building a compiler, so I'd be in favour of reimporting
> the old one under a new path.
>

So, I set the minimum USE_CXX_FEATIRES requirement to c++20, which pull
GCC10. 
I completely agree on this, and see it as a bug, considering that
upstream itself passes -stdc=c++17 to CFLAGS. 
The typical target system of worker is not ideal to build GCC10. 
Worker itself is quite powerful, but there are equivalent and more
user-friendly solutions for modern systems.