Re: bin/pip3.12 or bin/pip-3.12

[Benny Siegert <bsiegert%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 10:40 AM Dr. Thomas Orgis
<thomas.orgis%uni-hamburg.de@localhost> wrote:

> Yes, and my critique was that they
>
> 1. on other occasions adopted the scheme foo-$PYVERSUFFIX for new stuff, now
>    adding another instance that might prompt people to rename it, and
> 2. chose such a generic name, should be called pyidle. Or pydle, to be
>    more fun.

Maybe they should have, but second-guessing the Python upstream for a
decision made many years ago is not particularly actionable.

-- 
Benny