Re: Version numbers going backwards

[Benny Siegert <bsiegert%gmail.com@localhost>]

Am 24.02.25 um 20:42 schrieb John Klos:
> So why is it we can't not get vim thinking it depends on two versions of 
> vim-share after all these years? I haven't been able to figure it out.

The thing is, vim depends on the exact same version of vim-share. So you 
cannot update one without updating the other. If our package tools were 
a bit smarter, they would deal with that properly -- if you do a single 
transaction updating both, that should be fine.

--
Benny