Re: Overhauling gcc.mk

[Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%mnx.io@localhost>]

* On 2023-10-24 at 04:28 BST, David H. Gutteridge wrote:

> I've begun testing this on 9.3_STABLE/amd64, though I haven't got very
> far yet. No issues noted so far, it behaves as the previous version
> did (e.g., with openblas and firefox).

Thanks!

> I did wonder if ultimately we want to move other OS-specific fragments
> into their platform file, too, e.g.:
> https://github.com/TritonDataCenter/pkgsrc/blob/5a6b106903f2a7925062130280a705dde2b8ee94/mk/compiler/gcc-reqd.mk#L276

Yeh I'd like to do that too, I just need to figure out a way that it can 
be indicated appropriately, as mk/platform won't have access to the 
_NEED_* settings to override them.  Some sort of list of GCC_TOXIC 
pattern matches and then enhance gcc-reqd.mk to handle them.

Cheers,

--
Jonathan Perkin   -   mnx.io   -   pkgsrc.smartos.org
Open Source Complete Cloud   www.tritondatacenter.com