Lloyd Parkes <lloyd%must-have-coffee.gen.nz@localhost> writes: > I had a bit of read of our documentation and the NetBSD documentation. > > The name PKGSRC_USE_STACK_CHECK, the option -fstack-check, the usage > of PKGSRC_USE_STACK_CHECK in pksgrc and all the various bits of > documentation seem to line up fairly well. I don't think it's worth > changing any of it. We risk having inconsistent documentation if we > don't find all the references. seems reasonable > I can see value in adding a new pkgsrc setting. I'm not in love with > the length of the name PKGSRC_USE_STACK_CLASH_PROTECTION but maybe we > could have PKGSRC_PROTECT_STACK_CLASH? Then we would just need to add > a section B.1.2.3 to https://www.netbsd.org/docs/pkgsrc/hardening.html > and call the documentation done. Agreed about length but I think PKGSRC_USE is an important prefix, so how about PKGSRC_USE_STACK_CLASH?
Description: PGP signature