Re: Feelings about x11/qt5-qtbase build fix with -march=native?

To: <tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost>, Leonardo Taccari <leot%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Feelings about x11/qt5-qtbase build fix with -march=native?
From: "Dr. Thomas Orgis" <thomas.orgis%uni-hamburg.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:42:02 +0200

Am Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:17:08 +0200
schrieb "Dr. Thomas Orgis" <thomas.orgis%uni-hamburg.de@localhost>: 

> I still have this patch lying around, which fixes qt5-qtbase builds
> with a certain range of gcc versions that have bad interaction of
> -march=native -march=somethingother.
> 
> Fine to commit during freeze?

Ping.

> + # -march=haswell is supported as of GCC 4.9 and Clang 3.6
> +-QMAKE_CFLAGS_ARCH_HASWELL           = -march=core-avx2
> ++# https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-71564
> ++QMAKE_CFLAGS_ARCH_HASWELL           = -mavx2


Alrighty then,

Thomas

-- 
Dr. Thomas Orgis
HPC @ Universität Hamburg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Feelings about x11/qt5-qtbase build fix with -march=native?
  - From: nia

References:
- Feelings about x11/qt5-qtbase build fix with -march=native?
  - From: Dr. Thomas Orgis

Prev by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Next by Date: Re: Feelings about x11/qt5-qtbase build fix with -march=native?
Previous by Thread: Feelings about x11/qt5-qtbase build fix with -march=native?
Next by Thread: Re: Feelings about x11/qt5-qtbase build fix with -march=native?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index