Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> writes:
> Specifically, what do people think about
>
> Index: pkgformat-vars.mk
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/mk/pkgformat/pkg/pkgformat-vars.mk,v
> retrieving revision 1.11
> diff -u -p -r1.11 pkgformat-vars.mk
> --- pkgformat-vars.mk 18 Dec 2020 17:14:58 -0000 1.11
> +++ pkgformat-vars.mk 22 Dec 2020 14:21:32 -0000
> @@ -32,7 +32,11 @@ PKG_INFO_CMD?= ${PKG_TOOLS_BIN}/pkg_inf
> LINKFARM_CMD?= ${PKG_TOOLS_BIN}/linkfarm
>
> # Latest versions of tools required for correct pkgsrc operation.
> -PKGTOOLS_REQD= 20200828
> +.if !empty(USE_PKG_ADMIN_DIGEST:M[Yy][Ee][Ss])
> +PKGTOOLS_REQD= 20191008
> +.else
> +PKGTOOLS_REQD= 20100914
> +.endif
> # Latest version of pkg_install required to extract packages
> PKGTOOLS_VERSION_REQD= 20091115
>
> With that, pkgin still forces new pkg_install, but cwrappers builds w/o
> insisting on an update.
>
> (I am testing on netbsd-9 before the pullup, so I have pkg_install
> 20191008 in base.)
Manuel has reported that this patch works in his pkgbuild environment.
I agree with his point that people doing bulk builds should not have to
munge pkg_install tools from the base system. (I think it's ok to have
to configure pkg_install.conf.)
Therefore, I would like to commit this. However, I would really like
comments and/or testing from more people.
So, I'll commit this sometime after 24 0Z December (~8.5 hours from now)
if I don't hear objections, and perhaps earlier if I get a lot of
positive comments.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature