[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [PATCH] ham/chirp update
Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012%yahoo.com@localhost> writes:
> What you say makes sense in principle, but in the case of chirp,
> upstream have decided they are going to release their packages as
> chirp-daily. I think the OP's approach probably makes more sense.
> From: https://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Download
> "you do not need to worry about finding a stable version to run. You
> should always be on the latest build available."
I didn't mean to say we should definitel not package their snapshots.
But still, at:
the latest news is "0.4.1 is released". So upstream should resolve
their inconsistency issues.
I still think we should call it chirp-devel, so as not to pretend that
upstream follows release norms when they do not.
Main Index |
Thread Index |