Re: Rust broken again! (but differently this time)

[Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>]

Tobias Nygren <tnn%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
>Rust is now sadly broken on aarch64 too (and probably all arches except
>amd64?). The bootstrap binaries need libLLVM-8.so which came implicitly
>from lang/llvm, which was just updated to version 9. So we have nothing
>that provides libLLVM-8.so. I guess the bootstrap files have to be
>updated. It's better if we can make it use the built-in llvm
>so it doesn't rely on existence of pkgsrc libraries.

Would it be possible to include a private copy of llvm in the bootstrap
binaries of rust ?

The bootstrap binaries currently also break if you specify any build
options for pkgsrc llvm to include fewer targets.