Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle

To: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
From: Martin Husemann <martin%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 10:24:14 +0100

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:22:07AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> In my opinion, slight cost of performance is superior to maintenance
> burden of indirect syscall API in C.

I am not sure where this slight performance hit would come from, especially in
the context of statically linked binaries.

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
  - From: maya

References:
- Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
  - From: Benny Siegert
- Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

Prev by Date: Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
Next by Date: Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
Previous by Thread: Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
Next by Thread: Re: [golang-dev] Re: Moving Go to a newer NetBSD ABI in the 1.13 dev cycle
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index