Re: reimport mesa 18, remove old MesaLib packages

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Tobias Nygren <tnn%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes:

> In my opinion version 18 should not have been imported as a separate
> package but should have replaced version 11. We need only one package
> going forward. The GL API itself is quite stable even if the hardware
> support move fast.

If you think the odds of needing to multiversion are < 20% over 3 years
(just making that up - not a policy), then a single name sounds ok to
me, and it's not a big deal in any case.