tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: fontconfig and x11-links



On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 23:22:28 +0100
Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:20:47AM -0600, Greg Oster wrote:
> > I'm seeing a zillion of these sorts of errors when trying to do a
> > 'pkg_chk -u';
> > 
> > make[2]:
> > "../../mk/buildlink3/../../mk/buildlink3/pkgconfig-builtin.mk" line
> > 55: warning: Couldn't read shell's output for "/usr/bin/sed -n  -e
> > 's/Version: 7\.0\.31/2018.1/p'  -e 's/Version:
> > 7\.0\.32/2018.4/p'  /usr/X11R7/lib/pkgconfig/xproto.pc"
> > 
> > 
> > Running just: 
> > 
> >  /usr/bin/sed -n  -e's/Version: 7\.0\.31/2018.1/p'  -e 's/Version:
> >   7\.0\.32/2018.4/p'  /usr/X11R7/lib/pkgconfig/xproto.pc
> > 
> > yields no result.
> > 
> > Packages have also started failing to build with the following
> > errors: ...
> > checking for LIBUDEV... no       
> > checking for LIBDEVQ... no       
> > Please specify at least one package name on the command line.
> > --print-errors: not found        
> > checking for GLPROTO... yes      
> > configure: error: Direct rendering requires libdrm >= 2.4.60
> > *** Error code 1                 
> > ...
> > 
> > I'm seeing this on two different amd64/7.1_STABLE systems with
> > -current pkgsrc.  
> 
> 7.1's xorg is not currently supported by the builtin script.
> 
> We thought of extending the sed to make any non-xorgproto version
> 2007.x for now (with arbitrary x) and lowering the minimum requirement
> in xorgproto/bl3.mk to that version. But so far it's just an idea
> without implementation or testing if it even improves the situation.

So what are those of us running a release with 7.1 xorg supposed to do
to upgrade packages?  I don't really want to switch back to pkgsrc X11
as switching back and forth every time something gets seriously broken
seems... broken.  (This would be my 3rd or 5th switch to/fro/back/forth
between non-pkgsrc X11 and pkgsrc X11...)  Right now I can't even
upgrade 7.1 to the latest firefox 59 :(

Thanks.

Later...

Greg Oster


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index