[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:41:50AM +0300, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost> writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:32:27PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > > I started a similar discussion a couple years ago. The response was that
> > > > g95 is the only thing that works on many platforms and pkgsrc is committed
> > > > to portability.
> > >
> > > That's not the point. The point is that all the alternative packages
> > > like gcc49 etc are much more heavy by including things like the Java
> > > backend. You can easily select a different implementation, but for
> > > casual users, it is way too heavy. That ignores all the usual problem of
> > > dealing with multiple GCC versions at the same time. We hit some of them
> > > due to rpath ordering already.
> > So why not have a gcc48-fortran package (or whatever) that builds just
> > the fortran compiler?
> Because of libtool.
We already have a separate libtool package for Fortran using things.
Main Index |
Thread Index |