tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: ACCEPTABLEness of Standard PIL License (graphics/py-Pillow)

Greg Troxel <> writes:

> Software license.  From the LICENSE file at
> I find:
> "Like PIL, Pillow is licensed under the MIT-like open source PIL Software License:"
> which to me is a clear statement that the licensors believe that the PIL
> Software License is similar to the MIT license and meets the Open Source
> definition.

Ancient, FWIW: :

>I'm still using the original Python (pre-1.6) license, which is also
>used by many other Python extensions.  in OSI terms, this is known as
>the "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer":


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index