Re: Adding SHA-512 to the list of digests

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:00:45PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Please check the last assumption!  Doing so is really easy, and if
> anything goes wrong, checking it will avoid papering over a real
> problem with a bad SHA-512 hash.

It will double the runtime of the script, and the next build of the
package will fail anyway because not all the checksums will match the
real file.

> Any reason to omit the SHA1 line for now?

Because two checksums for the same file are quite enough? :)
 Thomas