tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 2013Q3 freeze pre-announcement

   Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:27:18 +0200
   From: Pierre Pronchery <>

   When signing with "gpg", it requires an implementation (probably
   security/gnupg) to be installed and available. This may be problematic
   for bulk builds, because this binary would then need to be bootstrapped
   first in some way - without signing its package obviously.

Why would security/gnupg be a problem for bulk builds any more than
pkgtools/pbulk, net/rsync, &c.?

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index