tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: DEPENDS lines with multiple packages, and old bulk builds (perl)

To: Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: DEPENDS lines with multiple packages, and old bulk builds (perl)
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:20:26 +0200

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:54:00PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Looking in doc/pkgsrc.txt, the use of {pkg1>=x,pkg2>=y} is not
> described, and the text is quite clear that only a single package
> belongs on the left hand side.

The syntax means that either pkg1>=x is acceptable or pkg2>=y.

Why is the syntax a problem? I don't think the pattern has changed in
a long time, has it?
 Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DEPENDS lines with multiple packages, and old bulk builds (perl)
  - From: Greg Troxel

References:
- DEPENDS lines with multiple packages, and old bulk builds (perl)
  - From: Greg Troxel

Prev by Date: DEPENDS lines with multiple packages, and old bulk builds (perl)
Next by Date: Re: DEPENDS lines with multiple packages, and old bulk builds (perl)
Previous by Thread: DEPENDS lines with multiple packages, and old bulk builds (perl)
Next by Thread: Re: DEPENDS lines with multiple packages, and old bulk builds (perl)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index