Re: Why adding unconditional dependency on tradcpp? (Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/tightvnc)

["OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:56:10 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger 
<joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:32:53PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 21:15:36 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger 
> > <joerg%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> >
> > >Log Message:
> > >Always use tradcpp. Fix prototypes. Bump revision.
> >
> > You are doing such changes (Always use tradcpp) for not a little packages,
> > whereas I have ever no problem before.
> >
> > Then, why not do it as conditionally (for broken situation for you)?
>
> I strongly prefer to get consistent behavior. Given that this is imake
> we are talking about, any improvement on that front is worth the minimal
> price.

"we"? you and who?

I cannot find `imake' in x11/libX11, x11/libXext, x11/libXt,....?

For consistent behavior, you can kill platform native X, libraries, tools,
compiler... support and force to use them from pkgsrc and you can create
your perfect world.

--
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost