tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: licenses/open-font-license

To: rodent%NetBSD.org@localhost, tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost, obache%netbsd.org@localhost, gdt%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: licenses/open-font-license
From: rodent%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 19:55:42 -0400

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 08:53:20PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> 
> Sounds good, but please call them open-font-v1.1 and open-font-v1.0,
> since they are in the default-allowed set.

Would "ofl-v1.1" and "ofl-v1.0" be alright? They're referred to as such on
SIL's website. Shorter == better?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: licenses/open-font-license
  - From: Thomas Klausner

References:
- licenses/open-font-license
  - From: rodent
- Re: licenses/open-font-license
  - From: Thomas Klausner

Prev by Date: Re: handle #! /usr/bin/env
Next by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: licenses/open-font-license
Next by Thread: Re: licenses/open-font-license
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index