David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost> writes: > swig2 installs 'swig2' on its own, so that should probably be left > alone. OK - in that case it seems like we are not tweaking upstream to change the name, and thus the failure-to-find-swig2 is really a bug in the depending (upstream) packages. So I agree that changing PKGBASE is the right thing.
Attachment:
pgpljsfK7ob4L.pgp
Description: PGP signature