Re: Mesa status ?

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:41:40PM +0200, iMil wrote:
> > I don't understand the need to create sub-packages either; having one big 
> > MesaLib one similar to upstream would prevent unnecessary work IMHO.
> 
> Agreed.

IIRC: Since MesaLib is rather low in the dependency chain, some parts
were split off to reduce unnecessary dependencies.
 Thomas