Re: buildlink3.mk vs builtin.mk

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:01:57AM -0500, Larson, Timothy E. wrote:
> Some of my package's dependencies have a builtin.mk as well as a 
> buildlink3.mk.  Should I include the former instead of the latter in my 
> package's Makefile? Other packages' Makefiles have CHECK_BUILTIN.pkgname set 
> around the include, but I can't find documentation describing this. I could 
> try blindly following the examples, but I'd prefer to understand. Reading the 
> Pkgsrc Guide is not very illuminating on this point.

In a package Makefile, only include buildlink3.mk.
The builtin.mk files will be handled automatically by the
infrastructure.
 Thomas