Re: poppler-includes

[Adam <adam%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

> I ran into a moderately mysterious build failure the other day that
> turned out to be caused by mismatched poppler and poppler-includes.
> Shouldn't poppler depend on poppler-includes (*) to prevent this from
> happening?
> 
> (*) or perhaps vice versa, but I assume the reason the includes
> package exists separately at all is to avoid needing to install the
> libs for things that depend only on stuff in the headers...

Yesterday, I encountered exactly the same problem trying to build inkscape.

Cheers,
Adam