Re: revbumps and version sharing

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:03:26PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>   | It shouldn't really hurt, the revision is still supposed to be increased
>   | only.
> 
> That would mean that when a "case slips through" whoever fixes it
> knows that in this case (unlike most, or all, others) they're not supposed to
> delete PKGREVISION after a version update.

As long as it happens soon enough, it is not really a problem. With soon
here being within a few hours at most. If the delta is larger is larger,
it falls into the general category of "Don't do that".

>   | There is a supposed to be a list of locations the Makefile.common or
>   | whatever is included from.
> 
> Where is this list supposed to be?   I'm not a developer, so there's no
> need for me to have access if it is somewhere private, but (at least for
> cdrdao), I see nowhere that I can observe where that list exists.

At the top of the file.

Joerg