Re: Getting rid of binary package subdirs?

To: Dieter Baron <dillo%danbala.tuwien.ac.at@localhost>
Subject: Re: Getting rid of binary package subdirs?
From: Adam Hoka <adam.hoka%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:38:14 +0200

On 09/16/09 14:26, Dieter Baron wrote:

In article<4AB0D882.3060500%gmail.com@localhost>  Adam wrote:
: Hi!

: I'm wondering if we have any good reason to keep subdirs for binary
: packages on FTP. The current foo_1970Q1/All scheme is pretty
: counter-intuitive from the user perspective. So, could we just use a
: single directory for holding the binary packages from the bulk builds?

   I'm all for it.  To ease transition, we should add an All ->  .
symlink for the next 1-2 branches.


Yeah, I've been thinking the same.

References:
- Re: Getting rid of binary package subdirs?
  - From: Dieter Baron

Prev by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Next by Date: Re: Getting rid of binary package subdirs?
Previous by Thread: RE: Getting rid of binary package subdirs?
Next by Thread: Re: Getting rid of binary package subdirs?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index