Re: Getting rid of binary package subdirs?

[David Brownlee <abs%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Adam Hoka wrote:

> I'm wondering if we have any good reason to keep subdirs for binary packages 
> on FTP. The current foo_1970Q1/All scheme is pretty counter-intuitive from 
> the user perspective. So, could we just use a single directory for holding 
> the binary packages from the bulk builds?

        I would be happy to see the All subdir plus the other subdirs of
        symlinks go away (in case anyone is counting noses :)

--
                David/absolute       -- www.NetBSD.org: No hype required --