Re: Is is time to rename firefox?

[Tim Zingelman <zingelman%fnal.gov@localhost>]

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Geert Hendrickx wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:35:43AM -0600, Tim Zingelman wrote:
> > Patches are available for firefox 2.0.0.20 to fix the latest security
> > issues reported:
> >
> > CVE-2009-0355
> > CVE-2009-0356
> > CVE-2009-0357
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/firefox/files/
> > patch-ff-380418
> > patch-ff-460425
> > patch-ff-466937
> >
> > I am happy to generate patches for the package to incorporate them and
> > bump the version to 2.0.0.20.
>
>
>
> Firefox 2.0.0.20 has been released but fixes a Windows-only issue (actually,
> adds a fix already present in 2.0.0.19 but missing in the Windows binaries).
>
> http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2008/mfsa2008-65.html

That is understood.  Would you prefer the pkgsrc firefox stay at 2.0.0.19 
plus the above patches?  I just assumed that going to 2.0.0.20 would 
produce less questions.  Either way it would be nb1, right?

 - Tim