tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
patching Makefiles vs. setting things straight with post-install & mv(1)
Hi,
I asked an author if he is willing to add another configure switch to
his software which would allow the separation between `where to look for
configure files' and `where to install configure files'.
See pkgsrc developer guide 15.2.2. & 15.2.3. (``the packages themselves
must not touch the contents of ${PKG_SYSCONFDIR} directly'') for
the reason behind this request.
Here is his response:
> What is the difference between changing the Makefiles of an
> application to put its configuration files where the pkgsrc
> developer guide requires or following the application's
> Makefiles in the NetBSD machinery with find and mv commands?
>
> find /somewhere/outside/of/PREFIX -name '*.conf' |
> xargs -I {} mv {} $PREFIX/share/examples
>
> --confdir is possible, but I would like to avoid adding
> mechnanisms unless really necessary.
So, why do we prefer patching over simply moving files in post-install?
Thanks,
Petar Bogdanovic
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index