Re: Fortran is desperatly undersupported

[Aleksej Saushev <asau%inbox.ru@localhost>]

Adam Hoka <adam.hoka%gmail.com@localhost> writes:

> Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>
>> The main problem comes from using f2c, which requires patching the
>> source to include fake MAIN__ subroutine. On FreeBSD you can link
>> against libg2c (which is another nasty hack), you don't you have
>> such option NetBSD. Many interesting practical packages require
>> real Fortran, sometimes of '90 or '95 standard, and f2c doesn't
>> give even Fortran-77 compiler of reasonable quality.
>> 
>> Something has to be done with it.
>
> Why don't you use g95?
> I dont know if its in the list of acceptable fortran compilers, but it should 
> be.

"It should be," sure. It isn't.
It isn't even a list.


-- 
HE CE3OH...