[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Use stricter PATH during build
Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov%tut.by@localhost> writes:
> >> The real issue is that this is very like to just disable features
> >> silently.
>> We already have the opposite, worse problem with packages that
>> silently enable features based on what happens to be available in
> It is always better to _explicitly_ disable unnecessary features by
> changing CONFIGURE_ARGS. And I think this the only way to package
> software correctly. STRICT_PATH is not a real solution because you
> have no control over non-NetBSD environment.
We have other places, where we hardcode paths. E.g. _OPSYS_SYSTEM_RPATH.
Having _OPSYS_BASE_PATH doesn't break existing concepts.
Explicit disabling numerous features, which are silently disabled for you,
just adds useless garbage.
Main Index |
Thread Index |