Re: Order of ipf, ipnat and bpf

To: tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Order of ipf, ipnat and bpf
From: Pierre-Philipp Braun <pbraun%nethence.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 18:02:55 +0300

On 19/05/2022 12:01, Edgar Fuß wrote:

-- for a packet processed by an ipnat rdr rule, you, in an ipf rule,
    need to use the re-written port number

are you referring to the internal interface? (on the front-facinginterface, it would be the original port number)


also ipnat is dont on the front-facing interface right?

or you're doing a gateway with only one NIC? (also possible)

--
Pierre-Philipp Braun
SMTP Health Campaign: enforce STARTTLS and verify MX certificates
<https://nethence.com/smtp/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Order of ipf, ipnat and bpf
  - From: Edgar Fuß

References:
- Order of ipf, ipnat and bpf
  - From: Edgar Fuß

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 + tunnel + ESP + IPcomp?
Next by Date: Re: Order of ipf, ipnat and bpf
Previous by Thread: Order of ipf, ipnat and bpf
Next by Thread: Re: Order of ipf, ipnat and bpf
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index