Re: KAME PR 154

[Andrew Cagney <andrew.cagney%gmail.com@localhost>]

Thanks!

On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 at 04:42, Gert Doering <gert%greenie.muc.de@localhost> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 10:05:49PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > Would anyone happen to have a copy of the KAME bug database and be
> > able to pass along the details of this bug?
> > All I've got is this comment:
> > > * This is a temporary workaround for KAME PR 154.
> > > * Don't really care even if it fails.
> > followed by snd/rcv buf fiddling.
>
> The wayback machine claims to have find something that might match
> what you're looking for
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20051018071352/http://www.kame.net/dev/query-pr.cgi?pr=154
>
> -----------------
> Description
> (found by fujie%iij.ad.jp@localhost)
>
> if you inject more than 70 keys into the kernel in one "setkey" command, ENOBUFS will be raised.
>
> similarly, if you try to perform "setkey -D" when more than 70 keys are in the kernel, ENOBUFS will be raised.
> kernel will raise the following message:
>         key_sendup0: sbappendaddr failed
> -----------------
>
> gert
>
> --
> "If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
>  feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
>  it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
>                              Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
>
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert%greenie.muc.de@localhost