[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Porting umb(4) from OpenBSD
On 3 May 2018 at 03:48, Taylor R Campbell
> > Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 04:29:18 +0200
> > From: Pierre Pronchery <khorben%defora.org@localhost>
> > On 02/05/2018 14:59, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> > > First thing that jumps out at me is that our usb_task is still broken.
> > > Ugh! We need to fix that, but it likely requires a kernel API change,
> > > so maybe it's too late for netbsd-8 at this point.
> > Is there something I should know? ie any workaround I should apply, or
> > unexpected behaviour I should keep in mind?
> We don't _have_ usb_wait_task. There's no workaround. We need to
> rewrite usb_task so it works, but it requires an API change to add
> usb_wait_task, and possibly an ABI change to struct usb_task unless we
> can shoehorn the necessary state into it.
Would it make sense to get the API change in now and pushed for
netbsd-8 (even if it doesn't (yet) work), so a later pullup would be
Main Index |
Thread Index |