Re: removing NATM netnatm

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <555FA5CE.2020201%netbsd.org@localhost>,
Tyler Retzlaff  <rtr%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>hey,
>
>On 5/22/2015 6:21 AM, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Tyler Retzlaff <rtr%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> just soliciting opinions for removal of NATM (sys/netnatm).
>>>
>>> it has been bitrotting away for what looks like years, never
>>> gets compiled (not even by ALL kernels) and given its condition
>>> I doubt it is used by anyone anywhere.
>>>
>>> is there a process to be followed for removing it?  is there a
>>> reason to keep it around?
>>
>> No objection means ok to remove? :)
>
>That's how I'm interpreting it.  If you want to do it go ahead I got a 
>little busy the last couple of weeks and haven't had a chance to looking 
>in to what ATM drivers should go at the same time.

I think if people did not object we should just remove things that are unused.
After all we can always bring them back to life if people want them.

christos